【Blockchain Rhythm】Significant signals came on January 21. The recent statements by Fabio Panetta, the Governor of the Bank of Italy, have attracted attention—he explicitly pointed out that in the traditional banking system, commercial bank money and central bank money are the true foundation of the monetary system, and stablecoins can only serve as a supplementary role, making it impossible to shake the existing financial order.
What is the logic behind this? Panetta believes that the stability of stablecoins fundamentally depends on their peg mechanism to fiat currency, which in fact becomes their bottleneck—because they cannot operate independently without fiat support, the space for stablecoins to operate independently within the financial system is severely compressed. In other words, no matter how stable stablecoins are, they are essentially proxies for fiat currency.
Against the backdrop of geopolitical polarization and the shifting global economic focus toward the technology sector, Panetta reminds the banking industry: payment and settlement have become the most core competitive battlefield for banks, and digital financial innovation is putting pressure on traditional banks.
More notably, the Bank of Italy remains highly cautious about multi-issuer stablecoins (i.e., stablecoins issued by different institutions across multiple jurisdictions). The Deputy Governor of the central bank has publicly warned that such stablecoins may pose legal, operational, and financial stability risks to the European Union, and therefore must be strictly controlled—only regions that meet the same regulatory standards can participate, and strict reserve requirements must be implemented. This means that advancing multi-issuer stablecoin schemes within the EU will face very high regulatory hurdles.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller69
· 9h ago
Stablecoins are just the workers of fiat currency. Still want to turn things around? Dream on.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 9h ago
From a technical architecture perspective, the logic behind Panetta is actually self-contradictory — stablecoins are stable because they are pegged to fiat currency, yet it is said that this limits their independence. But isn't that actually not what stablecoins are supposed to do? Quoting De Filippi's 2020 research on digital currencies, the original positioning of stablecoins is as a payment tool rather than financial infrastructure. The ECB is judging it using the wrong reference frame.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 9h ago
Basically, stablecoins are just the working class of fiat currency; they can't turn their situation around. Panetta's words really hit home.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 9h ago
Here we go with this set of rhetoric again... Fiat currency anchoring is inherently a shackle, and this logic has been rotten for a long time. If stablecoins truly operated independently, would they still be called stablecoins? That's laughable. Looking at the flow of USDT wallet addresses, the data clearly shows the underlying capital deployment. Banks aren't afraid of stablecoins threatening their dominance; they're afraid of losing their voice.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 9h ago
The governor's words are a bit too straightforward. Stablecoins are just fiat currency workers, and you still want to turn the tables and become the master? That's hilarious.
Bank of Italy signals stablecoin issuance: fiat currency anchoring becomes a shortcoming, multi-issuer model faces regulatory pressure
【Blockchain Rhythm】Significant signals came on January 21. The recent statements by Fabio Panetta, the Governor of the Bank of Italy, have attracted attention—he explicitly pointed out that in the traditional banking system, commercial bank money and central bank money are the true foundation of the monetary system, and stablecoins can only serve as a supplementary role, making it impossible to shake the existing financial order.
What is the logic behind this? Panetta believes that the stability of stablecoins fundamentally depends on their peg mechanism to fiat currency, which in fact becomes their bottleneck—because they cannot operate independently without fiat support, the space for stablecoins to operate independently within the financial system is severely compressed. In other words, no matter how stable stablecoins are, they are essentially proxies for fiat currency.
Against the backdrop of geopolitical polarization and the shifting global economic focus toward the technology sector, Panetta reminds the banking industry: payment and settlement have become the most core competitive battlefield for banks, and digital financial innovation is putting pressure on traditional banks.
More notably, the Bank of Italy remains highly cautious about multi-issuer stablecoins (i.e., stablecoins issued by different institutions across multiple jurisdictions). The Deputy Governor of the central bank has publicly warned that such stablecoins may pose legal, operational, and financial stability risks to the European Union, and therefore must be strictly controlled—only regions that meet the same regulatory standards can participate, and strict reserve requirements must be implemented. This means that advancing multi-issuer stablecoin schemes within the EU will face very high regulatory hurdles.