2018 was an interesting time. The blockchain space was bustling—some were pursuing faster transfer speeds, others obsessed with crypto collectibles, but very few projects truly considered opening new channels for traditional finance.
Large financial institutions were watching from the sidelines. They saw the potential in this field, but the issues were very real: transactions need to be fully transparent? That’s a nightmare for them. Inability to pass compliance audits? An even more distant dream. So they chose to wait.
It was this gap that created opportunities for new projects. One project chose not to follow the trend but decided to start from the fundamentals. Its approach was very clear— for crypto finance to be genuinely adopted by institutional users, it’s not about flashy technology, but about solving two core issues first: privacy protection and compliance requirements.
This isn’t just about building a simple bridge between two worlds. The real challenge lies in the fact that privacy and compliance are the very load-bearing structures of this bridge. On one side is the open and efficient nature of blockchain; on the other, the strict regulations of traditional finance. Only by satisfying both conditions simultaneously can institutions cross with confidence. This balancing ability is precisely the core competitive advantage of the project.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FastLeaver
· 10h ago
Well said, the breakthrough in privacy compliance has indeed been overlooked, and most projects are still racing to be faster.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 10h ago
Privacy and compliance are both met? That's the real challenge, and that's what big institutions are after.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 10h ago
2018 was really a good time for watching the excitement, everyone was blowing bubbles
Handling privacy and compliance at the same time? Easier said than done
Big institutions are like that, they only dare to move after paving the way
This idea is somewhat interesting, finally someone is not just showing off technical skills
Compliance really has everyone stuck; whoever can break this game wins
By the way, how is this project doing now? Is it still alive?
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 10h ago
The group of people in 2018 are still playing with fancy transfers, but few really want to connect with traditional finance.
This guy is right; handling privacy and compliance simultaneously is the real skill, everything else is just talk.
Wait, are you talking about that project? I think it failed before.
It's too idealistic to say that. Will institutions really buy in? Question mark.
This is what blockchain should be doing, not just hyping concepts.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 10h ago
Privacy and compliance met simultaneously? This difficulty level is truly the ceiling, but it's also exactly because it's hard that it's valuable.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 10h ago
Privacy and compliance handled simultaneously? That's the real competition, way more practical than just being twice as fast as TPS.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 10h ago
I’ve said it before, those projects that only know how to show off technology are doomed to dead ends. Privacy and compliance are the real key issues.
By the way, how are those big players who were watching in 2018 doing now? Are they still waiting?
This approach is really sharp, directly targeting the pain points without any nonsense.
Thinking back to those projects that claimed to revolutionize finance, nine out of ten ended up just being tools for speculation.
How many people can really pass the compliance hurdle? Truly.
2018 was an interesting time. The blockchain space was bustling—some were pursuing faster transfer speeds, others obsessed with crypto collectibles, but very few projects truly considered opening new channels for traditional finance.
Large financial institutions were watching from the sidelines. They saw the potential in this field, but the issues were very real: transactions need to be fully transparent? That’s a nightmare for them. Inability to pass compliance audits? An even more distant dream. So they chose to wait.
It was this gap that created opportunities for new projects. One project chose not to follow the trend but decided to start from the fundamentals. Its approach was very clear— for crypto finance to be genuinely adopted by institutional users, it’s not about flashy technology, but about solving two core issues first: privacy protection and compliance requirements.
This isn’t just about building a simple bridge between two worlds. The real challenge lies in the fact that privacy and compliance are the very load-bearing structures of this bridge. On one side is the open and efficient nature of blockchain; on the other, the strict regulations of traditional finance. Only by satisfying both conditions simultaneously can institutions cross with confidence. This balancing ability is precisely the core competitive advantage of the project.