Most people in the crypto world have misunderstood a concept: storage ≠ memory.
Look at projects like Filecoin and Arweave—they're like huge warehouses. Data stored there truly won't be lost, but the problem is—when you really need it, you have to dig through everything to find it. Very inefficient.📦
Now consider projects like Neutron and Vanar, which are entirely different in nature. They are like your cerebral cortex, where information exists in your thoughts and can be called upon instantly. Response speed is milliseconds.⚡️
What is the current bottleneck faced by AI models? It's not lack of cold storage—cold storage is everywhere. The real bottleneck is **real-time response capability**.
For example, AI needs to determine within 0.1 seconds: "This user prefers high-leverage trading," and then immediately adjust the strategy. This millisecond-level "reflex arc" can only be provided by projects with high-performance computing capabilities.
So stop comparing storage coins with computing layer projects. One is a warehouse for storing things, the other is a thinking brain. In the era of AI explosion, the brain is always more valuable than the warehouse.🧠💎
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fren_with_benefits
· 7h ago
Really, I’ve never understood why so many people are still speculating on storage coins. Reading this analysis finally made me realize how big the difference is.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 7h ago
To be honest, this analogy is indeed insightful. Storage projects are like hard drives, while the computing layer is like the CPU. Essentially, they are fundamentally different things.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 7h ago
Storage coins might have got the direction wrong; the real money is always in the computing power sector.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 7h ago
Oops, another new concept for cutting leeks, sounds just like the real thing
Storing coins is just a warehouse manager, the computing layer is the real brain—I've heard this kind of rhetoric before, every new project claims the same
But on the other hand, can Neutron really respond in milliseconds? From on-chain data, it looks completely congested, yet they hype it up as if it's the cerebral cortex, hilarious
In the AI era, quick response is necessary, I agree, but how do you know this isn't just another marketing tactic for a capital pump?
The question is, can this kind of computing layer project survive the next bear market, or will it just go back to zero?
Most people in the crypto world have misunderstood a concept: storage ≠ memory.
Look at projects like Filecoin and Arweave—they're like huge warehouses. Data stored there truly won't be lost, but the problem is—when you really need it, you have to dig through everything to find it. Very inefficient.📦
Now consider projects like Neutron and Vanar, which are entirely different in nature. They are like your cerebral cortex, where information exists in your thoughts and can be called upon instantly. Response speed is milliseconds.⚡️
What is the current bottleneck faced by AI models? It's not lack of cold storage—cold storage is everywhere. The real bottleneck is **real-time response capability**.
For example, AI needs to determine within 0.1 seconds: "This user prefers high-leverage trading," and then immediately adjust the strategy. This millisecond-level "reflex arc" can only be provided by projects with high-performance computing capabilities.
So stop comparing storage coins with computing layer projects. One is a warehouse for storing things, the other is a thinking brain. In the era of AI explosion, the brain is always more valuable than the warehouse.🧠💎