Currently, all public blockchains are competing in transaction speed, but honestly, is TPS really still the key bottleneck?
I don't think so. The real challenge Web3 faces now is actually its disconnection from the real world. How to bring real assets onto the chain? Securities, real estate, physical goods—these are the main focus.
The Dusk project caught my attention precisely because their approach is very down-to-earth. They are not just issuing tokens and telling stories, but seriously building a complete system from infrastructure to application layer. Piecrust's zero-knowledge proof virtual machine technology is used to handle privacy and complex computations; Citadel is working on digital identity authentication and management—these are all necessary prerequisites for bringing real assets onto the chain.
From another perspective, once the mainnet operates stably and the ecosystem expands, the scale of assets carried by Dusk compared to its current market value is simply staggering. How much potential is there in laying out now for future returns?
Instead of fussing over who has faster TPS, it's better to ask who truly solves practical needs. Be a long-term investor and let time do the verification. 💎
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LostBetweenChains
· 7h ago
Honestly, the TPS system has been overhyped for a long time. Continuing to just pile up numbers here really shows a lack of clear thinking.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 7h ago
actually, if you ran the numbers on dusk's current market cap versus potential tvl in real-world asset tokenization... the basis points of upside here are frankly absurd. most people miss this entirely because they're distracted by meaningless tps theater. classic market inefficiency nobody's pricing in yet.
Reply0
SleepTrader
· 7h ago
Real assets on the chain are the way to go; TPS has been a heated topic for a long time. Dusk's logic indeed hits the key point.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 7h ago
The true asset on-chain is indeed the breakthrough point; the TPS competition is somewhat missing the main point.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 7h ago
Well said, the TPS approach has been outdated for a long time. It's no longer about speed. On-chain real assets are the true way, and Dusk's approach really hits the mark.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 7h ago
On-chain real assets are the true way forward; the TPS hype is no longer convincing.
Currently, all public blockchains are competing in transaction speed, but honestly, is TPS really still the key bottleneck?
I don't think so. The real challenge Web3 faces now is actually its disconnection from the real world. How to bring real assets onto the chain? Securities, real estate, physical goods—these are the main focus.
The Dusk project caught my attention precisely because their approach is very down-to-earth. They are not just issuing tokens and telling stories, but seriously building a complete system from infrastructure to application layer. Piecrust's zero-knowledge proof virtual machine technology is used to handle privacy and complex computations; Citadel is working on digital identity authentication and management—these are all necessary prerequisites for bringing real assets onto the chain.
From another perspective, once the mainnet operates stably and the ecosystem expands, the scale of assets carried by Dusk compared to its current market value is simply staggering. How much potential is there in laying out now for future returns?
Instead of fussing over who has faster TPS, it's better to ask who truly solves practical needs. Be a long-term investor and let time do the verification. 💎