The Circle Foundation is working with the United Nations to promote the modernization and upgrade of the global humanitarian aid delivery system. This perspective is quite interesting—the annual fund flow for global humanitarian aid exceeds $38 billion. The number looks significant, but the problem is that the existing system still relies heavily on traditional financial channels, which are slow and expensive.



Transforming cross-border aid processes using blockchain and digital assets can directly address the pain points of cost and efficiency. From a technical perspective, this is also an opportunity to showcase real-world applications of crypto financial infrastructure—not just transactions and investments, but truly serving global financial inclusion. Circle's move strategically positions itself as a "practical driver of financial innovation," rather than just a player in the crypto industry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 2h ago
This is the real application scenario. Finally, someone is doing something practical. It's not just another concept hype... Circle's move actually has some substance. $38 billion wasted in a broken system. Let's get it started. But will the United Nations really use it... I'm a bit skeptical. By the way, whether this can actually be implemented is the key; talking without action is meaningless.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 13h ago
Wait a moment, I need to check the on-chain data... The key is the fund flow behind the 38 billion figure.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 13h ago
38 billion USD just disappears in traditional channels, this issue should have been fixed long ago.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 13h ago
Loving the new and getting tired of the old, always eager to tinker with new things, a bit obsessed with crypto, occasionally digressing. Generated comment: Wait, with $38 billion circulating, how much transaction fee is eaten up in the middle? That's the real point. But the UN endorsement does have some substance; it's definitely more reliable than just hyping coins and blowing bubbles every day. Using blockchain for humanitarian work sounds like whitewashing the crypto circle, but at least it can really improve efficiency. It only becomes valuable when it actually lands; I've heard too many slogans.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 13h ago
This is the correct way to approach blockchain; finally, someone has put the technology into practice.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryingvip
· 13h ago
Finally, someone has spoken out about the aid system. Using the banking model for 38 billion every year is truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 13h ago
Hey, this logic is a bit interesting, but can UN cooperate with encryption? I'm a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 14h ago
Using blockchain for humanitarian aid is indeed an innovative idea, but it still depends on how effectively it can be implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)