Solana Founder Says Stablecoins Are Exposing Major Flaws in Banking

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: Solana Founder Says Stablecoins Are Exposing Major Flaws in Banking Original Link: Banks charge fees, hold your money for months, and pay you almost nothing in return. Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko says stablecoins are exposing just how broken that system really is.

In a recent interview, Yakovenko shared real numbers from Solana’s own business and laid out what’s coming for the network in 2026.

A $40 Million Test Case

Solana sold 150,000 phones at $500 each. Customers paid with either credit cards or stablecoins.

The credit card payments came with a 2% fee. Worse, Solana had to wait 60 to 90 days to actually receive those funds.

The stablecoin payments, on the other hand, had no fees and funds were available immediately.

“As a merchant, we had to pay a fee on the credit cards about 2%. And we didn’t have to pay that fee on the stablecoin part. We got the stablecoin funds immediately. On the credit cards, we had to wait 60 to 90 days before we actually got the funds in our bank account.”

That gap in cost and speed added up to several engineering salaries saved on one product launch.

The Banking Spread No One Talks About

Yakovenko also called out how banks profit from depositors without offering much in return.

Banks pay customers around 0.5% interest on deposits. Meanwhile, they earn close to 5% by parking that same money in treasuries. That 10x spread, Yakovenko argued, would collapse in any truly competitive market.

Stablecoin companies can offer 4% yields instead. And that’s exactly why banks are pushing back.

“The difference, the spread… is astronomical. In any kind of contestable market, that would be impossible.”

According to Yakovenko, banking lobbyists are now fighting stablecoin regulation to stop these rewards from reaching everyday users.

What’s Next for Solana in 2026

Yakovenko confirmed that Solana will roll out Alpenglow, a new consensus algorithm. It will replace the original proof-of-history system.

More stablecoins and real-world assets are also expected to launch on the network.

He added that recent market structure discussions could open the door for companies to IPO directly on-chain, a move that would mark a major shift in how public markets operate.

SOL-0,56%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
rug_connoisseurvip
· 3h ago
The traditional banking system indeed needs to be dismantled; stablecoins have directly pierced through this layer of window paper.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 3h ago
That banking system really deserves to go bankrupt. The fees are ridiculously high, transfers are painfully slow, stablecoins just crush them outright.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOraclevip
· 3h ago
The banking system indeed needs reform, but can stablecoins really save the day? It still seems to depend on real-world application.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 3h ago
nah this ain't even the hot take everyone thinks it is... banks r broken sure, but stablecoins? lmao those are just playing by the same rules, different skin. the real alpha move is watching who actually has the capital to survive the next washout 🤐
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)