The shift in U.S. crypto legislation is certainly a "glass half-full, glass half-empty" situation. While the return of Democrats to the negotiating table is a massive signal that there is a bipartisan appetite for a win, the path to a "smooth" passage is still littered with high-stakes friction.
Here is an analysis of why this legislation is both closer than ever and yet remarkably far from the finish line. The Case for Optimism (Why it might pass)
Political Momentum: 2026 is a midterm election year. Both parties are increasingly aware of the "crypto voter" and the massive campaign donations flowing from the industry. Passing a bill allows both sides to claim credit for protecting consumers while fostering innovation.
Administrative Pressure: The White House has made "making America the crypto capital" a public goal. With executive advisers like David Sacks pushing for a January/February breakthrough, there is top-down pressure on committee chairs to stop stalling.
The recent passage of the GENIUS Act (which handled stablecoins) proved that a framework can actually make it through the legislative gauntlet. The current bill—the CLARITY Act—is essentially the "sequel" that addresses the rest of the market. Despite the renewed talks, three major "poison pills" are currently gumming up the works:
This is the biggest current sticking point. Banks are terrified that stablecoin "rewards" (interest) will drain their deposits. Republicans recently added language to ban these rewards, causing industry giants like to actually withdraw their support for the bill.
The 60-Vote Hurdle: Even if the Senate Agriculture and Banking committees pass their versions, they need 60 votes on the Senate floor to overcome a filibuster. Without a rock-solid bipartisan compromise, the bill could easily die in the full Senate.
Some Democrats are pushing for strict ethics amendments related to the President’s family ventures in the crypto space
My Take: Will it pass?
It is unlikely to pass "smoothly." Expect several more "last-minute" postponements and dramatic 11th-hour revisions. However, the most likely outcome is a "Narrow Compromise" by mid-2026. Lawmakers will likely strip out the most controversial bits (like DeFi and yield) just to get the core registration and custody rules across the finish line.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Yusfirah
· 35m ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
ShizukaKazu
· 1h ago
2026 Go Go Go 👊
View OriginalReply0
Discovery
· 1h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
HighAmbition
· 2h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
Thynk
· 2h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
DragonFlyOfficial
· 3h ago
2026 Go Go Go 👊
Reply0
楚老魔
· 4h ago
Hold on tight, we're about to take off 🛫
View OriginalReply0
Crypto_Buzz_with_Alex
· 4h ago
“Really appreciate the clarity and effort you put into this post — it’s rare to see crypto content that’s both insightful and easy to follow. Your perspective adds real value to the community. Keep sharing gems like this! 🚀📊”
#CryptoRegulationNewProgress
The shift in U.S. crypto legislation is certainly a "glass half-full, glass half-empty" situation. While the return of Democrats to the negotiating table is a massive signal that there is a bipartisan appetite for a win, the path to a "smooth" passage is still littered with high-stakes friction.
Here is an analysis of why this legislation is both closer than ever and yet remarkably far from the finish line.
The Case for Optimism (Why it might pass)
Political Momentum: 2026 is a midterm election year. Both parties are increasingly aware of the "crypto voter" and the massive campaign donations flowing from the industry. Passing a bill allows both sides to claim credit for protecting consumers while fostering innovation.
Administrative Pressure: The White House has made "making America the crypto capital" a public goal. With executive advisers like David Sacks pushing for a January/February breakthrough, there is top-down pressure on committee chairs to stop stalling.
The recent passage of the GENIUS Act (which handled stablecoins) proved that a framework can actually make it through the legislative gauntlet. The current bill—the CLARITY Act—is essentially the "sequel" that addresses the rest of the market.
Despite the renewed talks, three major "poison pills" are currently gumming up the works:
This is the biggest current sticking point. Banks are terrified that stablecoin "rewards" (interest) will drain their deposits. Republicans recently added language to ban these rewards, causing industry giants like to actually withdraw their support for the bill.
The 60-Vote Hurdle: Even if the Senate Agriculture and Banking committees pass their versions, they need 60 votes on the Senate floor to overcome a filibuster. Without a rock-solid bipartisan compromise, the bill could easily die in the full Senate.
Some Democrats are pushing for strict ethics amendments related to the President’s family ventures in the crypto space
My Take: Will it pass?
It is unlikely to pass "smoothly." Expect several more "last-minute" postponements and dramatic 11th-hour revisions. However, the most likely outcome is a "Narrow Compromise" by mid-2026. Lawmakers will likely strip out the most controversial bits (like DeFi and yield) just to get the core registration and custody rules across the finish line.