Jin10 data reported on June 21: The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to fast-track legal challenges against the broad imposition of tariffs on Trump. On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the timeline requests made by two educational toy manufacturers seeking to overturn several import tariffs imposed by Trump. This rejection means that the U.S. government will have the usual 30 days to submit a complete response, rather than the shorter timeline requested by the two companies in their application on Tuesday. The two companies, Learning Resources Inc. and hand2mind Inc., hoped the Supreme Court would take unconventional steps to hear the case without waiting for a ruling from the federal appeals court. The Trump administration argued that the Supreme Court should allow the normal appeals process to proceed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request to expedite the hearing of the Trump tariff case.
Jin10 data reported on June 21: The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to fast-track legal challenges against the broad imposition of tariffs on Trump. On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the timeline requests made by two educational toy manufacturers seeking to overturn several import tariffs imposed by Trump. This rejection means that the U.S. government will have the usual 30 days to submit a complete response, rather than the shorter timeline requested by the two companies in their application on Tuesday. The two companies, Learning Resources Inc. and hand2mind Inc., hoped the Supreme Court would take unconventional steps to hear the case without waiting for a ruling from the federal appeals court. The Trump administration argued that the Supreme Court should allow the normal appeals process to proceed.