Interesting market observation: A well-known fund's analyst Mark Newton recently released an analysis of the stock market outlook for 2026. His core judgment is that the S&P 500 could surge to 7300 by the end of the year, but there will be some turbulence along the way.



What kind of turbulence? He believes that the current rebound can continue for another six to eight weeks, but then resistance will need to be faced. Starting from late February or early March, the entire stock market will enter a pressure phase, which could last until the end of May. He attributes this decline mainly to the potential recession in the technology sector.

Interestingly, there were some disagreements within the fund at the end of last year, but after the start of this year, the team basically reached a consensus — the market will definitely experience turbulence in 2026, but the overall outlook remains optimistic. This shift from disagreement to unity also reflects changes in the market situation. For those paying attention to macro factors, this judgment is worth noting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Anon4461vip
· 01-10 05:55
I quite agree with Mark's logic. The fluctuations before the end of May definitely require caution. A tech recession? How is that possible? Isn't this just hype? Wait, from disagreement to consensus within the fund, that actually makes me more uneasy... The number 7300 is a bit bold. At his pace, it seems the risk during the pressure period is even greater. Starting the pressure period in early March? So should I buy the dip now or reduce my holdings? I'm a bit unsure. This judgment is old-fashioned. Every year they say there will be fluctuations, but it ends up rising again. What does it usually mean when the team reaches a consensus? Maybe I'm overcomplicating things. After a rebound of six to eight weeks, it drops again. This rhythm feels a bit too perfect. If tech really is going into recession, can 7300 be broken through? The logic is a bit convoluted. Just focus on the overall direction. The intermediate fluctuations can be seen as a roller coaster.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHomevip
· 01-09 12:50
I've heard the narrative of technological recession too many times. Every time it's said like this, but what's the result? Anyway, I'll just watch the trend at the end of February and decide then whether to reduce my position.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMastervip
· 01-09 12:50
It's the same old narrative of tech recession again, saying that every time haha --- Mark's words sound nice, but will it really fall in 6-8 weeks? Anyway, I don't believe it --- From disagreement to consensus... Isn't this just a unified stance after being proven wrong? --- That number 7300 sounds good, but I won't jump into the pit at the end of May --- Tech recession? Wake up, how many years have they been saying that --- Interestingly, why do all the funds suddenly think the same? Is it really a coincidence? --- If March is really a pressure period... I need to reduce my holdings earlier --- I'm tired of this "positive outlook on the big picture" statement, it's just a trap
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxietyvip
· 01-09 12:33
It's the same old story again. That part about technological decline sounds a bit familiar to me.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachinevip
· 01-09 12:29
Mark Newton's statement sounds like he's leaving himself an escape route, saying that after rising to 7300, there will be a big drop, so he won't lose either way. Blaming the tech industry downturn is quite smooth, but will it really be that neat... The fund's transition from internal conflict to a unified consensus is happening way too fast, I find it hard to believe. Will it drop from February and March to the end of May? Might as well just say I don't know. By the way, where does the number 7300 come from? It feels like they just added a couple of zeros randomly. Wait, did their team really reach a consensus or are they just pretending to have one? That's the key. Predictions like this often end up being proven wrong, I wouldn't bet those 500 bucks.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)