#美联储降息 【Cryptographic Experiments in the Gaming World: How YGG Is Redefining Ownership】
When we talk about how cryptocurrencies are changing the financial system, many people still only focus on price fluctuations and trading. But what Yield Guild Games (YGG) is doing is more interesting — it brings the core logic of crypto into the gaming world, executing a real application deployment.
**Who Is Replacing Whom with Smart Contracts?**
In traditional games, all rules are centralized. The company determines what your account looks like; the company sets the value of virtual assets. YGG is different. It uses smart contracts to manage assets and revenue sharing; the code is immutable, and no one can arbitrarily change the rules. This may sound like a minor detail, but it hits the biggest pain point of traditional gaming — do users truly own their assets?
**The Significance of Token Liquidity**
$YGG acts as a connector within the ecosystem. Collaboration and value exchange among players, guilds, and developers are all facilitated through this token. Rather than just an investment asset, it functions more like the "fuel" that keeps the entire ecosystem running. Holders can benefit from ecosystem growth and also have voting rights on key decisions.
**Three Changes, One Direction**
The first change is straightforward: anyone worldwide can participate — no barriers, no approvals. This is the fundamental promise of cryptocurrency, and YGG has implemented it in the gaming sector.
The second change involves ownership. Players’ NFTs, tokens, reputation records — these truly belong to you and can be traded on open markets. They are not assets owned by the game company; they are your assets. This is impossible in traditional gaming.
The third change has the most promising outlook: community governance. Major decisions about YGG’s development direction, funding allocation, and new game collaborations are decided by $YGG holders through voting. This is not just a slogan — it’s real DAO practice.
**Why Does This Have the Greatest Impact on the Traditional Gaming Industry?**
All three dimensions are important, but if we rank them, the redefinition of ownership is perhaps the most disruptive. Because it directly challenges the business logic that gaming companies have relied on for decades — monopolizing virtual assets to create user stickiness. Once players truly own their characters and equipment, the market becomes fluid, transparent, and difficult to control. This is a threat to traditional vendors but an emancipation for players.
The power of community governance will become evident in the mid-term, and the advantages of an open economy require a more mature ecosystem to fully realize. But ownership? That’s the change people can feel immediately and is the easiest to clash with existing systems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChain_Detective
· 12-16 07:40
hold up, pattern analysis suggests ygg tokenomics might have some red flags here... let me pull the data on those dao voting mechanisms first before we celebrate ownership narratives. not saying rugpull but... statistical anomaly detected in how they're positioning governance. dyor folks.
Reply0
MEVHunter
· 12-15 21:08
The moment ownership truly starts to flow, the market begins to lose control. This is what traditional game developers are truly afraid of... But how much room is there now for YGG's gas fee arbitrage? Keep an eye on the mempool.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 12-13 09:27
actually if you read the vesting schedule... YGG's still dumping lol, classic exit pump pattern masked as "community governance"
Reply0
governance_ghost
· 12-13 09:22
Ownership definitely hits the sore spot, but how is YGG's liquidity right now? It still seems like it depends on whether the ecosystem can really take off.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStriker
· 12-13 09:22
Ownership is the key, and this logic should have been challenged long ago.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 12-13 09:20
Ownership really hits the sore spot. Game companies have been relying on monopolizing virtual assets to reap profits for so many years, and now it's about to be broken.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 12-13 09:16
Wait, can YGG really shake up the traditional gaming landscape? It still feels a bit uncertain...
#美联储降息 【Cryptographic Experiments in the Gaming World: How YGG Is Redefining Ownership】
When we talk about how cryptocurrencies are changing the financial system, many people still only focus on price fluctuations and trading. But what Yield Guild Games (YGG) is doing is more interesting — it brings the core logic of crypto into the gaming world, executing a real application deployment.
**Who Is Replacing Whom with Smart Contracts?**
In traditional games, all rules are centralized. The company determines what your account looks like; the company sets the value of virtual assets. YGG is different. It uses smart contracts to manage assets and revenue sharing; the code is immutable, and no one can arbitrarily change the rules. This may sound like a minor detail, but it hits the biggest pain point of traditional gaming — do users truly own their assets?
**The Significance of Token Liquidity**
$YGG acts as a connector within the ecosystem. Collaboration and value exchange among players, guilds, and developers are all facilitated through this token. Rather than just an investment asset, it functions more like the "fuel" that keeps the entire ecosystem running. Holders can benefit from ecosystem growth and also have voting rights on key decisions.
**Three Changes, One Direction**
The first change is straightforward: anyone worldwide can participate — no barriers, no approvals. This is the fundamental promise of cryptocurrency, and YGG has implemented it in the gaming sector.
The second change involves ownership. Players’ NFTs, tokens, reputation records — these truly belong to you and can be traded on open markets. They are not assets owned by the game company; they are your assets. This is impossible in traditional gaming.
The third change has the most promising outlook: community governance. Major decisions about YGG’s development direction, funding allocation, and new game collaborations are decided by $YGG holders through voting. This is not just a slogan — it’s real DAO practice.
**Why Does This Have the Greatest Impact on the Traditional Gaming Industry?**
All three dimensions are important, but if we rank them, the redefinition of ownership is perhaps the most disruptive. Because it directly challenges the business logic that gaming companies have relied on for decades — monopolizing virtual assets to create user stickiness. Once players truly own their characters and equipment, the market becomes fluid, transparent, and difficult to control. This is a threat to traditional vendors but an emancipation for players.
The power of community governance will become evident in the mid-term, and the advantages of an open economy require a more mature ecosystem to fully realize. But ownership? That’s the change people can feel immediately and is the easiest to clash with existing systems.