The trend of $AIAV is a bit hard to interpret. Could it be that the large holdings during the founding period are gradually selling off, and other addresses are taking over? What is this pattern of position transfer indicating?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BugBountyHunter
· 11h ago
Isn't this a typical pump-and-dump swap? It's a warning sign before early big players run away.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 11h ago
Yeah, be careful. I've seen too many of these relay dump schemes.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 11h ago
The tactic of big players dumping and then buying the dip is played out; it feels like they're just digging a hole for retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 11h ago
Large capital turnover? Same old trick, retail investors get cut like leeks, and that's it.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 11h ago
Feels like a prelude to a dump, the big players fleeing and passing the baton to retail investors—this trick is so old.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 11h ago
This is just manipulation; this tactic is as old as the hills.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 11h ago
Look at this supply and demand curve—big players quietly offloading, retail investors picking up the slack. How many times does this script need to be played out before it's enough?
The trend of $AIAV is a bit hard to interpret. Could it be that the large holdings during the founding period are gradually selling off, and other addresses are taking over? What is this pattern of position transfer indicating?