SatoshiScrib

You don’t need to launch your own chain to benefit from @arbitrum Orbit.
I’ve been digging into this, and honestly, the composability perks are low key huge for any dApp builder.
Here’s what you get even if your core app stays on Arbitrum One or Nova:
- Run your app logic on a private L3 for enterprise clients without touching public throughput
- Prepare for shared sequencers as they come online to cut infra costs
- Use custom gas tokens on Orbit based gaming or social apps so players aren’t burning ETH on tiny actions
In my opinion, Orbit isn’t just for teams spinning up standalone chains. It

Looking at the data from @0xfluid, it’s clear something special is happening on @arbitrum.
In just one year, Fluid’s activity share moved from 74% on other chains down to 10.5%. That tells me a massive migration is underway.
Meanwhile, lending on Arbitrum has doubled, growing from $67M to over $140M. It’s not just talk, it’s real growth.
For me, the most telling stat is that Fluid now holds about $25M of the roughly $40M in total DAI liquidity on Arbitrum DEXs. That makes it the number one hub for USDai on the chain.
When builders choose to launch on platforms like @LemonApp and @massdotmoney,

Check the activity. @arbitrum One just hit 2.9 million monthly active users. In my view, that’s the signal you need.
The daily average chart shows a clear lead over other networks. OP Mainnet sits at 690,000. I’m seeing consistent growth for Arbitrum since mid December.
This tells me one thing. Builders and users are choosing where to go. The data points to Arbitrum.
For you, this means focus. Develop where the users are. Allocate resources to networks with proven activity. Arbitrum has that activity right now.
The numbers make the case. 2.9 million users is a strong foundation for your next p

✈️ RYR63GJ
Aircraft: B38M
Altitude: 17,850 ft (FL179)
Speed: 383 kts
Heading: 313°
Tracked via DeRadar - Decentralized Aircraft Tracking
Powered by Derad Network, & Arweave

Looking at this chart, I see a clear pain point for #Ethereum users. The average transaction fee on Ethereum is over twenty times higher than on @arbitrum One.
This cost difference matters every single day. It changes what you can do affordably on the network. High fees make small transactions and regular interactions impractical. They add up fast.
Arbitrum solves this directly. It provides a secure scaling solution that drastically lowers your costs.
This chart shows the practical benefit. Arbitrum solves this pain directly. It keeps Ethereum's security but moves the work off the main chain.

✈️ RYR12FF
Aircraft: B38M
Altitude: 30,425 ft (FL304)
Speed: 424 kts
Heading: 279°
Tracked via DeRadar - Decentralized Aircraft Tracking
Powered by Derad Network, & Arweave

I'm looking at this block time comparison, and the numbers tell you everything.
#Ethereum processes blocks every 12.1 seconds. @arbitrum One does it in 250 milliseconds.
You're waiting 48x longer on Ethereum for the same confirmation. This delay affects your entire user experience.
Here's what this means in practice:
- Your DEX trades confirm in a quarter second vs 12 seconds
- Gaming transactions feel instant instead of laggy
- DApp interactions respond immediately
Users don't abandon transactions out of frustration
In my opinion, this speed difference solves Ethereum's biggest UX problem. Pe

If you’re still paying gas to list items that never sell, you’re subsidising inefficiency.
@BosonProtocol's Off-chain listings remove that tax for failed deals. You can negotiate privately, execute atomically, and pay once.
This is how small players and AI agents actually survive, not by clogging networks with expensive maybe-transactions.

Looking at Q4 2025, @arbitrum One's GDP shows strong continued growth. I think this trend tells us something important.
For builders, this data is useful. It shows a network where economic activity is not just high, it's consistent. Users are settled in.
Here is what that means for your project:
- You are building on a platform with proven staying power.
- The user base is engaged in more than just token swaps.
- Fee revenue supports further ecosystem development.
You want your application to be where the real usage is.
This chart indicates that's happening on #Arbitrum. The activity is buildi

Stylus vs. EVM: The Great Debate That Isn’t
Everyone keeps asking me: "Is @arbitrum Stylus going to replace Solidity?" Wrong question.
Stylus and EVM aren’t competitors. They’re teammates. Here’s why the future of smart contracts isn’t about picking sides, it’s about having options.
Solidity dominates smart contract development. It’s familiar and works well.
But forcing every developer to learn Solidity limits who builds onchain. Rust developers stay away. C++ teams skip blockchain entirely.
The EVM also has performance limits. Memory and compute costs scale poorly for certain workloads. Some

I’ve been thinking about AWS lately. Not the cloud service, but what it changed for the internet.
Before AWS, building online meant huge upfront costs. Servers. Data centers. Ops teams.
Now, you spin up infra fast.
@arbitrum Orbit feels like it’s playing a similar role for Web3.
Here’s the parallel I see:
2000s: Companies bought physical servers
2010s: AWS made compute rentable
Today: dApps compete for shared Ethereum blockspace
Orbit lets you deploy dedicated chains with far lower setup friction.
Shared infra shifts toward customizable infra.
What makes Orbit different from a standard L2 setu