#稳定币支付 After reviewing this stress test analysis of the 2026 World Cup prediction market, what I'm most focused on is actually the stablecoin payment infrastructure — because this directly determines the actual profit withdrawal efficiency for copy trading.

The current situation is clear: Visa has already launched an on-chain USDC settlement pilot in December, but the ECB is warning about the risks of private stablecoins. What does this mean? Copy trading players will likely face a differentiated landscape by 2026 — fund deposits and withdrawals on US-based platforms will become smoother, but settlement friction in Europe and other restricted regions may actually increase.

My assessment is that when selecting copy trading targets, you need to place more weight on the platform's payment infrastructure. Those platforms that have already established stablecoin channels (especially those integrated with institutional players like Visa for settlement) shouldn't experience withdrawal delays or fund congestion during the World Cup peak period. Conversely, platforms still relying on traditional banking channels will see withdrawal speed become a bottleneck under peak trading volume impact.

This isn't just a convenience issue — for copy trading, a complete risk management loop includes timely stop-loss and fast withdrawals. If settlement infrastructure is inadequate, even if you follow the right expert, it's just paper profits; you won't get the real money. So I'm now examining the collaboration depth between mainstream betting platforms (DraftKings, FanDuel) that are already in the market and exchanges integrated with stablecoins. Whoever has the more direct connection will be more stable under extreme load.

Truth comes from practice — for the next round of quality copy trading target selection, regulatory compliance + payment infrastructure must both be solid.