#比特币价格走势 VanEck's perspective is interesting—Bitcoin lagging the Nasdaq by 50% this year is actually being interpreted as a signal for a reversal next year. From a copy-trading logic standpoint, this kind of view is worth examining carefully.



The key is how you interpret this "misalignment." If it's just a simple technical rebound theory, then its reference value is limited. But the combination that Schassler mentioned—currency depreciation + liquidity return—is indeed a core driver that has historically pushed Bitcoin upward. The question is whether these conditions can actually occur simultaneously in 2026.

My observation is that some traders in the market are already positioning ahead of this expectation. When doing position-splitting copy-trading, some have started increasing their allocation weight to macro traders, especially those who are simultaneously bullish on precious metals and digital assets. This style of trader does have a solid historical win rate, but volatility is also high—you need sufficient mental preparation and strict stop-loss discipline.

The current question is how to participate. If your risk tolerance is moderate, you could consider a 3:7 position-splitting ratio for copy-trading—30% following aggressive Bitcoin long positions, 70% following stable macro portfolios. But the prerequisite is finding traders with complete review records and strong stop-loss execution. VanEck's prediction is worth listening to, but when it comes to real money, it ultimately comes down to the historical performance of the executors.
BTC2,2%
Xem bản gốc
Trang này có thể chứa nội dung của bên thứ ba, được cung cấp chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin (không phải là tuyên bố/bảo đảm) và không được coi là sự chứng thực cho quan điểm của Gate hoặc là lời khuyên về tài chính hoặc chuyên môn. Xem Tuyên bố từ chối trách nhiệm để biết chi tiết.
  • Phần thưởng
  • Bình luận
  • Đăng lại
  • Retweed
Bình luận
0/400
Không có bình luận
  • Ghim