👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Crypto Community Reacts to Kraken vs SEC Legal Battle
In a recent development, Kraken Exchange has been hit with a legal complaint from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that Kraken has been operating as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing house, setting the stage for a legal showdown.
Kraken’s response to the SEC’s complaint has garnered significant attention from prominent figures within the cryptocurrency industry. Their reactions shed light on crypto companies’ challenges and uncertainties in the regulatory landscape.
Jesse Powell, co-founder of Kraken, expressed his frustration with the SEC’s actions in tweets. He characterized the regulatory body as relentless and questioned the effectiveness of a $30 million settlement reached in February. Powell raised concerns about the daunting costs and time associated with fighting the SEC, suggesting that crypto companies may have no choice but to exit the U.S. market.
Deaton criticizes Gensler
Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton joined the conversation, directing criticism at Gary Gensler, the head of the SEC. Deaton accused Gensler of pressuring Kraken into settling for $30 million despite believing it would secure peace. He cited the ongoing legal battles of Ripple and Brad Garlinghouse as examples of the immense financial toll such disputes can take. Deaton argued that Gensler’s actions disregarded the welfare of employees and investors, calling for accountability.
Dave Weisberg, CEO at CoinRoutes, contributed to the discussion by proposing a significant reform. He called for a ban on all enforcement actions by regulatory agencies unless they could prove harm. Weisberg argued that allowing agencies like the SEC to impose heavy financial penalties on firms without demonstrating harm was unjust. He also emphasized that this practice favoured established entities over innovators, stifling economic growth and investor returns.
Kraken’s legal battle with the SEC is a focal point for broader discussions about regulatory overreach and the need for more explicit guidelines in cryptocurrency. As the crypto market continues to evolve, there is a mounting call for nonpartisan congressional action to address these unique challenges, ensuring a fair and inclusive financial for all individuals.