The recent breakthroughs in advanced AI models are reshaping how traders approach cross-asset analysis. Running GLM-4.7 alongside Claude Code, I built a scanning tool that identifies outperformance opportunities across different asset classes simultaneously. The workflow starts with Claude mapping out the implementation architecture, establishing the framework for multi-class asset comparison. From there, the coded function executes systematic scans—comparing performance metrics, tracking volatility patterns, and flagging relative strength positions across crypto, equities, commodities, and alternative assets. This blend of planning-first approach with AI-assisted coding accelerates the process from conception to execution, making it feasible to monitor broader portfolio correlations in real time. The key insight: letting AI draft the blueprint first, then code the logic, substantially reduces iteration cycles and improves accuracy in identifying genuine alpha signals versus noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rugdoc.eth
· 10h ago
Bro, this process sounds good, but can it really beat the market noise when actually implemented?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 01-11 04:49
This logic is indeed good, but the real test is still in live trading, right... Are the signals generated just by scanning reliable?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 01-11 04:44
honestly the correlation matrix optimization here is decent, but you're basically just automating what any competent quant already does manually. the real question: are you actually capturing market microstructure inefficiencies or just fitting noise? because 90% of "alpha signals" i see are just survivorship bias dressed up in claude outputs.
Reply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-11 04:30
NGL, this process sounds a bit promising, but how does it actually perform when implemented? Just talking about planning-first still feels a bit superficial.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 01-11 04:20
This tool is indeed powerful, but I'm more curious about how it performs in real-world applications.
The recent breakthroughs in advanced AI models are reshaping how traders approach cross-asset analysis. Running GLM-4.7 alongside Claude Code, I built a scanning tool that identifies outperformance opportunities across different asset classes simultaneously. The workflow starts with Claude mapping out the implementation architecture, establishing the framework for multi-class asset comparison. From there, the coded function executes systematic scans—comparing performance metrics, tracking volatility patterns, and flagging relative strength positions across crypto, equities, commodities, and alternative assets. This blend of planning-first approach with AI-assisted coding accelerates the process from conception to execution, making it feasible to monitor broader portfolio correlations in real time. The key insight: letting AI draft the blueprint first, then code the logic, substantially reduces iteration cycles and improves accuracy in identifying genuine alpha signals versus noise.