The death of Iran’s leader sparks controversy in prediction markets; Kalshi refunds $2.2 million, with the CEO claiming they refused “death arbitrage.” Before the airstrike, U.S. lawmakers demanded strict scrutiny of contracts related to war and assassination predictions, with a deadline to respond by March 9.
Kalshi’s “Khamenei Resignation” Prediction Contract Sparks Debate
Following the joint U.S. and Israeli airstrikes that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that their platform’s trading volume exceeded $50 million on contracts related to the event. He emphasized that their goal was to prevent investors from profiting from the death.
The contract was titled: “Will Khamenei step down as Iran’s Supreme Leader?” with rules stating that if Khamenei dies, settlement would be based on the last trading price before death. When news of Khamenei’s death broke, a surge of funds flooded into the contract, and Kalshi suspended trading due to settlement chaos.
Kalshi later admitted that the settlement terms contained ambiguous language and ultimately decided to refund users’ net losses. Sources told Bloomberg that this move cost the platform about $2.2 million.
Kalshi’s Promotion and Settlement Standards Under Fire
After Kalshi processed refunds, criticism emerged within the community, mainly because Kalshi had promoted this contract at the time of the event. Last Saturday morning, news of Khamenei’s death began circulating, Kalshi posted on X: “Breaking: The probability of Khamenei no longer serving as Iran’s Supreme Leader has surged to 68%,” which Mansour also retweeted.
Image source: X
Former SEC Chief of Staff Amanda Fischer criticized this, saying Kalshi’s actions were akin to providing a marketplace for assassination proxies.
Users also criticized Kalshi’s settlement standards, pointing out that when Jimmy Carter passed away, the platform settled his contract as “no,” accusing the platform of only applying special terms when losing money.
Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, stated that Kalshi’s actions reveal an attempt to balance expanding trading volume with avoiding clear laws banning assassination-related bets.
Prediction Markets Cross the Line, U.S. Lawmakers Call for Investigation
Prediction markets are often seen as “anything can be traded,” but this incident highlights their limits. Before the U.S.-Israel airstrikes on Iran, California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff sent a letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig demanding strict regulation of contracts related to war and assassination, with a response deadline of March 9.
Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy also announced he is drafting legislation to ban such market contracts to prevent insider trading and manipulation based on known outcomes. The Kalshi settlement controversy proves that such betting markets should not exist.
Polymarket’s Wordplay Sparks Controversy
Compared to Kalshi, Polymarket still hosts 187 Iran-related markets. One of these predicts whether the U.S. will forcibly remove Khamenei before March 31. Polymarket ultimately settled this contract as “no,” reasoning that the U.S. only contributed or assisted in the killing, which sparked strong dissatisfaction among some commentators and calls for dispute resolution.
Because Polymarket relies on blockchain-based decentralized settlement mechanisms, the fairness of contract judgments remains under scrutiny.
On-chain data shows that, hours before the airstrike, six anonymous wallets collectively bet on “U.S. attacking Iran before February 28,” ultimately earning about $1.2 million. These wallets were almost all newly created accounts in February, with funds transferred within 24 hours before the event. Such suspicious trading patterns have raised concerns about military secrets leaking and potential on-chain insider arbitrage.
Related report:
Pre-airstrike prediction? Polymarket traders bet on US-Iran war, earning $1.2 million, sparking controversy
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
A court rules that sports betting contract agreements are derivatives! The US CFTC blocks local law enforcement and fights for regulatory control of prediction markets.
The U.S. federal government is working jointly with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and unify regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity11m ago
Claude Code automation research wins the hackathon championship! Winner: I didn’t even know how we won
At the Autoresearch Hackathon hosted by Paradigm, Ryan Li used AI to complete the problem-solving process and ultimately won the championship. He used multiple AI agents to automate research, generated more than 1,000 strategies, and successfully created an approximately 900-line Python market-making algorithm, demonstrating AI’s advantages in problem-solving. The competition emphasized AI’s exploration and decision-making capabilities, showing that it can serve as a core execution unit.
ChainNewsAbmedia3h ago
Holding sports betting contracts as derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement and seeks regulatory control over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it would change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the impact of state and local gambling laws.
CryptoCity3h ago
Polymarket Investigation Demanded by Congress After 50 New Accounts Bet on Iran Ceasefire Before Trump Announced It
Congressional scrutiny arises over Polymarket after over 50 new accounts placed bets on a US-Iran ceasefire just before Trump's announcement. Lawmakers are demanding a CFTC investigation, highlighting concerns about insider trading and the platform's regulatory status.
Cryptonews3h ago
A judge blocks Arizona from regulating prediction markets, halts the lawsuit against Kalshi
A U.S. federal court ruled to pause Arizona’s regulatory actions against the prediction market platform Kalshi, finding that the federal government has priority in regulating financial derivatives. The platform argues that its event contracts are not traditional gambling, but financial instruments. This ruling may affect a nationwide, unified regulatory framework for financial markets.
ChainNewsAbmedia4h ago
Sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement, seeking regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports betting contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the influence of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity6h ago
