COST

Costco Wholesale Corp Price

Closed
COST
$1.016,80
-$0,43(-%0,04)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 06:18 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 06:18, Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is priced at $1.016,80, with a total market cap of $449,51B, a P/E ratio of 51,71, and a dividend yield of %0,51. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $1.004,80 and $1.022,04. The current price is %1,19 above the day's low and %0,51 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,36M. Over the past 52 weeks, COST has traded between $937,02 to $1.022,04, and the current price is -%0,51 away from the 52-week high.

COST Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$1.018,55
Market Cap$449,51B
Volume1,36M
P/E Ratio51,71
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,51
Dividend Amount$1,30
Diluted EPS (TTM)19,25
Net Income (FY)$8,09B
Revenue (FY)$275,23B
Earnings Date2026-07-29
EPS Estimate4,95
Revenue Estimate$68,69B
Shares Outstanding441,32M
Beta (1Y)0.978
Ex-Dividend Date2026-01-30
Dividend Payment Date2026-02-13

About COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the operation of membership warehouses in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Japan, Korea, Australia, Spain, France, Iceland, China, and Taiwan. It offers branded and private-label products in a range of merchandise categories. The company offers sundries, dry groceries, candies, coolers, freezers, liquor, and tobacco and deli products; appliances, electronics, health and beauty aids, hardware, garden and patio products, sporting goods, tires, toys and seasonal products, office supplies, automotive care products, postages, tickets, apparel, small appliances, furniture, domestics, housewares, special order kiosks, and jewelry; and meat, produce, service deli, and bakery products. It also operates pharmacies, opticals, food courts, hearing-aid centers, and tire installation centers, as well as 636 gas stations; and offers business delivery, travel, same-day grocery, and various other services online in various countries. As of August 29, 2021, the company operated 815 membership warehouses, including 564 in the United States and Puerto Rico, 105 in Canada, 39 in Mexico, 30 in Japan, 29 in the United Kingdom, 16 in South Korea, 14 in Taiwan, 12 in Australia, 3 in Spain, 1 in Iceland, 1 in France, and 1 in China. It also operates e-commerce websites in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Australia. The company was formerly known as Costco Companies, Inc. and changed its name to Costco Wholesale Corporation in August 1999. Costco Wholesale Corporation was founded in 1976 and is based in Issaquah, Washington.
SectorConsumer Defensive
IndustryDiscount Stores
CEORon Vachris
HeadquartersIssaquah,WA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.costco.com
Employees (FY)341,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$807,14K
Net Income per Employee$23,75K

Learn More about Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)

Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) FAQ

What's the stock price of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) today?

x
Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is currently trading at $1.016,80, with a 24h change of -%0,04. The 52-week trading range is $937,02–$1.022,04.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

Should you buy or sell Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)?

x

How to buy Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) Latest News

2026-04-07 13:30

AVAX One builds a 10MW AI computing center in Canada, purchasing 220 BTC mining rigs as a stopgap.

Gate News, April 7, Nasdaq-listed company AVAX One Technology (AVX) announced progress on its AI infrastructure strategy. The company has signed a FEED package for a 10MW AI/HPC microgrid data center, located in Alberta, Canada. Leveraging the region’s low-cost natural gas power resources, it aims to build high value-for-money, scalable dedicated AI computing infrastructure. The project is led by BlueFlare for design and is set to become one of the first AI computing centers in the local area. Meanwhile, the company invested less than $500k to buy 220 Bitmain S21 Pro mining machines, increasing Alberta’s computing power from 150 PH/s to over 200 PH/s. This move serves as a transitional cash-flow source during the AI center construction period, implementing a two-track strategy of “mining + AI computing.”

2026-04-07 09:40

The U.S. dominates global Bitcoin mining, and a 5.8% drop in hashrate triggers a miners’ profitability crisis

Gate News message: In 2026 Q2, global Bitcoin hashrate fell 5.8% quarter-over-quarter to 1004 EH/s, signaling significant financial pressure for the mining industry. The Bitcoin price dropped from $126k in October 2025 to $65k in February 2026, directly weakening miners’ profitability. Hashprice fell to $27.89 per PH/s per day; operations have become difficult to sustain for equipment with efficiency worse than 25 J/TH. About 252 EH/s of hashrate is offline, and some may be permanently retired. Despite an overall decline in hashrate, the United States still accounts for 37.4% of the global Bitcoin hashrate—about 375 EH/s—maintaining its leading position. Russia ranks second with 16.9%, while China is 12%; however, after the 2025 Xinjiang compliance crackdown, about 13% of mining sites were shut down. These three countries together make up nearly 65% of global hashrate, indicating that network concentration remains high. Meanwhile, some emerging markets are growing rapidly. Kyrgyzstan is up 300% year over year, Paraguay is up 54%, and Laos and Finland have doubled their hashrate. Ethiopia also accounts for 2.5% of the global hashrate, showing the importance of policy support and natural resources in shaping mining deployment. By contrast, Iran’s hashrate fell by about 7 EH/s and Argentina’s dropped by 42%; macroeconomic and geopolitical factors continue to affect development in some regions. The Bitcoin network continues to self-adjust: in early April 2026, after difficulty fell by about 8% from the previous period, it then rose by nearly 4%, reflecting the mining protocol’s ability to adapt to hashrate changes. Overall, current hashrate fluctuations are mainly driven by price cycles. The mining industry’s sustainability still depends heavily on market conditions and hardware efficiency. With high-cost mining rigs being retired alongside expansion into emerging markets, the global Bitcoin mining landscape is undergoing a profound adjustment.

2026-04-07 03:47

A whale moved 300 BTC to a certain CEX about half an hour ago, incurring a loss of roughly $8.82 million

Gate News, April 7, according to crypto analyst Yu Jin’s monitoring, a whale address transferred 300 BTC to a certain CEX about half an hour ago, worth approximately $20.6 million. The address had previously, from January to March last year, bought a total of 510 BTC through a certain CEX at an average price of about $98,190, for a total cost of approximately $50.07 million. The 300 BTC transferred out this time correspond to realized losses of approximately $8.82 million.

2026-04-06 12:11

Strategy: Last week, it increased its holdings by 4,871 BTC, spending $329.9 million

Gate News message: On April 6, Strategy’s official disclosure showed that the company increased its holdings by 4,871 BTC last week at an average price of about $67,718 per BTC, with total expenditure of about $329.9 million. As of 2026, Strategy has cumulatively held 766,970 BTC, with total position cost of about $58.02 billion and an average holding price of about $75.644 per BTC.

2026-04-06 01:16

A whale deposited 31 million STO tokens into multiple CEXs, earning approximately $1.37 million

Gate News message, April 6, Onchain Lens monitoring shows that a whale address deposited 31 million STO tokens (worth about $5.86 million) in batches into multiple CEXs. This operation gave the whale a profit of about $1.37 million. On-chain data shows that this address had previously withdrawn 31.06 million STO tokens from a certain CEX, with a cost of about $4.49 million at the time.

Hot Posts About Costco Wholesale Corp (COST)

WalletManager

WalletManager

6 minutes ago
Just realized something interesting about Buffett's portfolio that most people are missing. While the Oracle of Omaha famously avoids chasing hot trends, he's quietly sitting on some of the best AI shares to buy right now through his massive $317 billion stock holdings. Let me break down what caught my attention. His team has positioned Berkshire in three major tech plays that are all leveraging AI in different ways, and together they represent a significant chunk of the portfolio. First up is Amazon at 0.7% of holdings. Most people focus on e-commerce when they think Amazon, but the real AI action is happening in AWS. They've got this insane $200 billion order backlog just sitting there waiting for data center capacity to come online. Amazon's spending $125 billion this year alone to build infrastructure. What's wild is they're not just renting compute - they built their own Trainium2 chips that cost 40% less than alternatives for AI training. Anthropic is already using 500,000 of these chips. This is exactly the kind of best AI shares to buy because it's infrastructure play, not just hype. Then there's Alphabet at 1.7%. Google Search could've been crushed by ChatGPT, right? Instead they moved fast. AI Overviews and AI Mode merged search with AI-generated answers, and it actually worked - revenue acceleration for two straight quarters. Google Cloud has a $155 billion backlog and they're pumping out their own TPU chips to compete with Nvidia. The stock's up 62% this year. Berkshire just loaded up in Q3 2025, which tells you something about where they see value. But here's the real position - Apple at 20.6% of the entire portfolio. Yeah, Buffett sold off most of his stake, but this is still their biggest holding. 2.35 billion active devices worldwide running Apple Intelligence. Every chip is optimized for AI while keeping battery life solid. That's a genuine competitive moat. The new iPhone 17 lineup is driving upgrade cycles way harder than expected. The pattern here is interesting - Buffett's not buying pure AI plays like Nvidia. He's buying companies with existing customer bases that are using AI to supercharge their core business. That's actually the smartest way to think about best AI shares to buy in 2026. Real revenues, real infrastructure, real competitive advantages. Not just the chip suppliers everyone's obsessing over. If you're looking at where to position your portfolio, this gives you a pretty good roadmap of what the smartest money is actually doing behind the scenes.
0
0
0
0
quiet_lurker

quiet_lurker

6 minutes ago
Ever wondered what forex brokers actually charge you? It's one of those things people don't really talk about until they realize they're losing money to fees nobody explained. Let me break down something I've been looking into recently. December hits and suddenly everyone's transferring money internationally—holiday bonuses, family gifts, travel plans. That's when you really notice how much these currency conversions cost you. I ran through some real numbers. Say you're sending $1,000 to someone in Europe. Depending on which provider you use, the difference between the cheapest and most expensive option is around 4.45%. That sounds small until you realize your recipient gets €42 less just because of exchange markups and transfer fees. Not great, right? The pattern is consistent across different currency pairs too. USD to British Pound? Similar story—about 4.36% variance between providers. USD to Mexican Peso? Still around 4.21% difference. The common thread: one provider consistently offers better rates while others lag significantly behind. What's interesting is how this scales. When you're transferring smaller amounts like $100, the fee difference jumps to over 8% between best and worst options. But at $10,000, it drops to around 4%. The lesson here is that people often get lazy with small transfers, which is exactly when fees become most brutal as a percentage. Now, forex brokers operate differently than money transfer services, but the fee structure matters just as much. Here's what most brokers charge: spreads (the difference between buy and sell prices) and commissions (the actual transaction cost). The spread varies wildly depending on market conditions and the broker. I looked at how much do forex brokers charge on the same currency pair across different platforms. For USD/EUR trades, the total fees ranged from $35 to $65 on a standard trade size—that's an 86% difference. Fusion Markets came in at $35 total while IC Markets was at $65. Same pair, same size trade, completely different cost. Here's what surprised me: spreads fluctuate monthly, but commissions stay relatively stable. That's important because it means you need to check spreads regularly if you're active, but commissions are more predictable. Most brokers only adjust commissions annually. When comparing USD/GBP trades across brokers, the variance actually gets worse. We're talking $52 to $105 in fees—almost double. This tells you that currency pair selection matters. Some brokers are competitive on major pairs but not others. The bigger picture? Switching from an expensive provider to a competitive one saves you roughly 4% on international transfers. For traders, the broker you choose directly impacts your profitability over time. A 4% fee difference compounds when you're making multiple trades. So what should you actually consider? First, make sure whoever you're using is regulated—FinCEN registered if you're in the US for money transfers, CFTC registered for forex trading. Then compare what forex brokers charge specifically for your currency pair and trade size. Don't just look at headline rates; check actual spreads and commissions. Open a demo account to test the platform before committing real money. And honestly, check their customer service responsiveness before you need it. The takeaway: yes, forex fees really do make a difference. The 4% you save by choosing wisely isn't just a number—it's real money in your pocket or your recipient's. Whether you're sending money overseas or trading currencies actively, spending 10 minutes comparing what different brokers charge is worth it.
0
0
0
0
WhaleMinion

WhaleMinion

10 minutes ago
Been thinking about this a lot lately - if you're seriously holding crypto, you need to understand the difference between keeping your coins on an exchange versus taking full control with a cold wallet. Most people don't realize how exposed they are until something goes wrong. So what exactly is a cold wallet? Basically, it's your crypto sitting offline, completely disconnected from the internet. Think of it like this: your private key is the master password to your digital assets, and a cold wallet keeps it locked away from hackers, malware, phishing attacks - all the online threats that can drain your account in seconds. Your public key is just like a bank account number you can share, but that private key? That never leaves the vault. There are a few ways to do this. Hardware wallets are the most popular - they're physical devices, basically fancy USB drives, that hold your keys offline. Trezor and Ledger are the big names here. Trezor's touchscreen models run around $250 and support over 1,200 tokens, while Ledger's options are a bit cheaper but use button controls instead. Then there's paper wallets, which is literally printing out your keys on paper - old school but effective if you keep it somewhere secure. Here's the thing though: the convenience factor is a real tradeoff. Platform wallets let you trade instantly without moving funds around, which is why active traders love them. But cold storage? You're looking at way better security at the cost of having to physically connect your device every time you want to move coins. It's friction, but it's the good kind of friction. Setting one up isn't complicated. You buy the device, install the official software, transfer your crypto over, and then generate a recovery seed - that's your 12-24 word backup phrase. Lose that and you might lose access to everything, so guard it like it's worth actual money. Because it is. The real question is: what are you doing with your crypto? If you're trading daily, cold storage will drive you nuts. If you're holding for years, it's basically essential. The cost - anywhere from $30 to $400 depending on the device - is usually worth it if you're serious about this space. Cheaper doesn't always mean better here. I see too many people get hacked because they took the convenience route and never moved their assets to proper cold storage. The security difference isn't subtle - it's the difference between being essentially unhackable versus being a target. Your private key, your responsibility, your safety.
1
0
0
0