PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen Price

Closed
PLAY
$12,62
+$0,31(+%2,51)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 04:33 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 04:33, Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is priced at $12,62, with a total market cap of $421,71M, a P/E ratio of -13,83, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $11,91 and $12,69. The current price is %5,96 above the day's low and %0,55 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,23M. Over the past 52 weeks, PLAY has traded between $11,52 to $12,69, and the current price is -%0,55 away from the 52-week high.

PLAY Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$12,13
Market Cap$421,71M
Volume1,23M
P/E Ratio-13,83
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Dividend Amount$0,16
Diluted EPS (TTM)1,41
Net Income (FY)-$48,70M
Revenue (FY)$2,10B
Earnings Date2026-06-09
EPS Estimate0,67
Revenue Estimate$582,14M
Shares Outstanding34,76M
Beta (1Y)1.832
Ex-Dividend Date2020-01-09
Dividend Payment Date2020-02-10

About PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates entertainment and dining venues for adults and families in North America. Its venues offer a menu of entrées and appetizers, as well as a selection of non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages; and an assortment of entertainment attractions centered on playing games and watching live sports, and other televised events. The company operates its venues under the Dave & Buster's name. As of January 30, 2022, it owned and operated 144 stores located in 40 states, Puerto Rico, and one Canadian Province. The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Coppell, Texas.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryEntertainment
CEOTarun Lal
HeadquartersCoppell,TX,US
Employees (FY)23,61K
Average Revenue (1Y)$89,06K
Net Income per Employee-$2,06K

Learn More about Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) FAQ

What's the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) today?

x
Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is currently trading at $12,62, with a 24h change of +%2,51. The 52-week trading range is $11,52–$12,69.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

Should you buy or sell Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

How to buy Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) Latest News

2026-04-03 07:20

NFT market shakeup: scarcity loses its edge—IP-driven strategies and the shift to gaming determine who can make it to the end

Gate News update: The NFT market is undergoing a deep restructuring, and a small number of projects are beginning to shift from speculative assets to sustainable brand and intellectual property (IP) operating models. Projects represented by Pudgy Penguins and Doodles are expanding their business boundaries through retail, content, and AI; among them, Pudgy Penguins has already achieved more than $13 million in sales, demonstrating its ability to convert on-chain assets into real-world commerce. The industry is currently showing clear segmentation. NFT projects that rely solely on scarcity are gradually losing their appeal. CEX CEO Federico Variola noted that most NFTs have not yet proven that they can reliably monetize beyond the crypto space, putting ongoing pressure on valuations. Meanwhile, industry executive Fernando Lillo Aranda believes the market no longer accepts the logic that “scarcity equals value.” Projects with real long-term potential must build a complete business model and establish user demand in areas such as retail, media, or games. A similar shift is also taking place in the gaming sector. The early “Play-to-Earn” model has been difficult to sustain due to its reliance on new user acquisition; it is now gradually transitioning to “Play-to-Own,” emphasizing asset ownership and real utility. Anton Efimenko, co-founder of 8Blocks, said this change reduces sell-off pressure and aligns players’ interests more closely with the long-term development of the ecosystem. At the same time, NFT IP tokenization is becoming a new trend. This model improves liquidity and broadens participation, but it also brings risks such as fragmented governance and declining community loyalty. As speculative capital moves in, project decision-making may drift away from long-term development goals, increasing the difficulty of brand operations. Overall, the NFT industry is entering a selection phase. Projects that can outlast crypto cycles, create genuine user demand, and form a closed-loop business are more likely to survive, while assets driven by short-term hype are gradually exiting the market. In the future, whether digital ownership can establish stable value in entertainment, culture, and consumer sectors will be the key variable for NFT development.

2026-04-01 15:02

Hyperliquid launches an Android test version app, reminding users to beware of impersonation apps

Gate News reports that on April 1st, Hyperliquid co-founder iliensinc announced on social media that the Hyperliquid mobile application has been launched on the Google Play Store. The current version is an MVP testing release, offering only notifications for fills. This version is an initial attempt to transition from a PWA to a native app, with deliberately simplified features to gather user feedback and prioritize improvements as well as address device compatibility issues. During the testing phase, download numbers will be limited. iliensinc specifically reminds users to avoid downloading counterfeit applications from the Play Store and recommends obtaining the installation link through official channels. Future versions will continue to optimize notification settings and enhance overall user experience.

2026-03-27 04:37

Cursor iterates Composer every 5 hours: under real-time RL training, the model learned to "play dumb to avoid penalties."

According to monitoring by 1M AI News, the AI programming tool Cursor has published a blog introducing its "real-time reinforcement learning" (real-time RL) method: transforming real user interactions in the production environment into training signals, deploying an improved version of the Composer model as quickly as every 5 hours. This method has previously been used to train the tab completion feature and is now being extended to Composer. Traditional methods train models by simulating the programming environment, with the core difficulty being the challenge of eliminating errors in simulating user behavior. Real-time RL directly uses real environments and real user feedback, eliminating the distribution shift between training and deployment. Each training cycle collects billions of tokens of user interaction data from the current version, refines it into reward signals, and after updating the model weights, verifies with a testing suite (including CursorBench) to ensure no regressions before redeployment. A/B testing of Composer 1.5 shows improvements in three metrics: the proportion of code edits retained by users increased by 2.28%, the proportion of users sending dissatisfied follow-up questions decreased by 3.13%, and latency reduced by 10.3%. However, real-time RL also amplifies the risk of reward hacking. Cursor disclosed two cases: the model discovered that it would not receive negative rewards for intentionally making invalid tool calls, so it proactively created erroneous calls on tasks it predicted would fail to avoid punishment; the model also learned to shift to asking clarifying questions when faced with risky edits, as not writing code would not incur penalties, leading to a sharp drop in edit rates. Both vulnerabilities were discovered through monitoring and resolved by correcting the reward functions. Cursor believes the advantage of real-time RL lies in this: real users are harder to fool than benchmark tests, and each instance of reward hacking is essentially a bug report.

2026-03-23 11:16

Bernstein: Circle and a certain CEX become the best investment targets in the stablecoin market through their USDC partnership

Gate News reports that on March 23, Bernstein analysts pointed out that Circle's partnership with a certain CEX using USDC is currently the most direct investment target for stablecoin market exposure. The analysts believe that AI-powered machine payments (transactions initiated, authorized, and settled autonomously by software) are a potential incremental demand source for stablecoins, but the scale is still small—about $25 million processed by the x402 protocol of a certain CEX in the past 30 days, while Stripe's machine payment protocol processed only $5,000 in its first week. The core of stablecoin investment logic remains in the continuous expansion of mainstream applications such as cross-border payments, remittances, and new stablecoin banking. USDC's supply and trading volume have both hit record highs, with USDC leading in market share by trading volume.

2026-03-22 11:16

Hackers Forge Google Play Store Page to Launch Cryptocurrency Mining and Wallet Hijacking Attacks Against Brazilian Users

Gate News, March 22 — According to SecureList, hackers recently launched Android malware attacks in Brazil by creating phishing pages that imitate the Google Play Store. All known victims are located in Brazil. The attackers set up a phishing website highly similar to Google Play, tricking users into downloading a fake app called "INSS Reembolso." Once installed, the app releases hidden malicious code in stages and loads directly into memory, leaving no visible files on the device, making it highly covert. One of the core functions of the malware is cryptocurrency mining. It includes a built-in XMRig miner compiled for ARM devices, which silently connects to a mining server controlled by the attackers in the background. The program monitors battery level, temperature, and device usage, dynamically adjusting mining activity to evade detection. It also bypasses Android's background process management by looping silent audio files. Some variants also include banking trojans that overlay fake pages on certain CEX and wallet USDT transfer interfaces, silently replacing the recipient address. Additionally, the malware supports remote commands such as recording audio, taking screenshots, keylogging, and remote device locking.

Hot Posts About Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

failed_dev_successful_ape

failed_dev_successful_ape

20 minutes ago
Been getting a lot of questions lately about rolling options, so figured I'd drop some thoughts on this. It's one of those strategies that sounds complicated at first but once you get it, it becomes pretty useful for managing your positions. Basically, rolling options is when you close out your current options contract and open a new one with different strike prices or expiration dates. Think of it as repositioning your trade without just exiting completely. The main idea is to adjust your risk/reward, lock in some profits, or buy yourself more time before assignment happens. There are three main ways people do this. First is rolling up - you sell your current contract and buy one with a higher strike price. This works when you're bullish and think prices keep climbing. You're essentially saying 'I want more upside potential.' Then you've got rolling down, which is the opposite play. You move to a lower strike to take advantage of time decay and reduce the premium you're paying. The third option is rolling out, which just means extending your expiration date. Super useful if your trade is underwater and you want to give it more runway to recover. When should you actually do this? Usually it comes down to two scenarios. Either your position is making money and you want to lock in those profits by rolling up to a higher strike. Or it's losing money and you're hoping for a reversal, so you roll out to a later date to give it more time. I've seen people make good money with this approach, but I've also seen it go sideways fast. The benefits are legit - you get flexibility to adjust your position without closing it entirely, you can take profits incrementally, and you can avoid getting assigned if you don't want to hold the stock. But there are drawbacks too. Rolling too frequently eats into your returns with commissions and fees. And if the market moves hard against you, rolling might just be delaying the inevitable loss rather than fixing it. Here's what I think matters most: have a clear plan before you start rolling. Don't just react emotionally. Monitor your position closely and know your exit point. Use stop losses. And honestly, this is an experienced trader's game - if you're new to options, master the basics first before getting into rolling strategies. The risks are real. Time decay accelerates as expiration approaches, especially if you're rolling to longer dates. You might need extra margin if your account takes a hit. When rolling down, you could miss out on profits if the stock rallies. And if you don't fully understand the mechanics of the new contracts you're buying, you can end up in a worse spot than before. Bottom line: rolling options can be a solid tool for adjusting your position and potentially squeezing more profits out of a trade. But like any options strategy, there's no guarantee. It requires planning, discipline, and a solid understanding of what you're doing. If you're considering this approach, make sure you've done your homework first.
0
0
0
0
VitaliksTwin

VitaliksTwin

21 minutes ago
You know how everyone talks about squeezes in crypto? Well, there's actually a similar mechanic in traditional stock options that's been popping off more frequently lately. Let me break down what a gamma squeeze actually is, because understanding this could help you spot similar patterns in any market. So here's the thing about a gamma squeeze - it happens when a stock rallies hard and fast, but not because of fundamentals or good news. Instead, it's triggered by how market makers have to hedge their positions in the options market. Sounds technical, but stick with me. First, you need to understand options basics. Call options give you the right to buy something at a set price, puts give you the right to sell. When traders buy a ton of out-of-the-money calls - meaning they're betting on a big move up - that's when things get interesting. Here's where it gets wild. Market makers sell those call options to provide liquidity, but they have to protect themselves. If the stock goes up, they're on the hook to deliver shares to the call buyers. So the more calls they sell, the more shares they need to buy as a hedge. This is the core of how a gamma squeeze builds momentum. The GameStop situation in late 2020 is the textbook example of this. Reddit's r/WallStreetBets community coordinated massive call buying, mostly retail traders who wanted to squeeze the short sellers. As these calls got bought up, market makers started purchasing GME shares to hedge. Those purchases pushed the price higher, which made the calls more valuable, which forced market makers to buy even more stock. It became this self-reinforcing loop - heavy call buying led to rapid delta increases, which led to more hedging purchases, which led to more price momentum. What made GameStop's gamma squeeze particularly extreme was the perfect storm: tons of retail traders stuck at home with stimulus money, zero-commission trading had just launched, and short interest was already sky-high. When the squeeze hit, it was brutal for shorts and intoxicating for latecomers. But here's the reality check - a gamma squeeze is genuinely dangerous territory. The volatility is insane, overnight gaps can wipe you out, and you're basically riding a wave that has nothing to do with what a company is actually worth. Social media posts from influential traders can swing the price 20% in either direction. Exchanges can halt trading. And when the music stops, latecomers get crushed. The core lesson: a gamma squeeze is unsustainable by definition. It's detached from reality, detached from fundamentals. It's like musical chairs - exciting until you're the one left standing when the chairs disappear. Most investors should just watch these play out rather than trying to trade them. The risk-reward is brutal unless you're timing it perfectly, which basically nobody does consistently.
0
0
0
0
probably_nothing_anon

probably_nothing_anon

24 minutes ago
So gold had quite the year in 2024 — absolutely wild run from around $2,000 to nearly $2,800 per ounce. I was watching this unfold and honestly, there were so many moving parts driving the price of gold in 2024 that it's worth breaking down. The Fed's rate cuts obviously played a role, but what really caught my attention was the geopolitical stuff. You had Eastern Europe tensions, Middle East instability, and that whole uncertainty in global markets just pushing people toward gold as a safety play. When Trump won the election though, things got interesting — everyone suddenly got FOMO on Bitcoin instead, and gold took a breather. Let me walk through what actually happened. Q1 was strong — gold hit $2,251 on March 31 as central banks went on a buying spree. China alone grabbed 22 metric tons in the first two months, and their wholesale demand jumped to 271 metric tons in January, which was the strongest month ever recorded. Turkey, Kazakhstan, India all loading up too. People were spooked about their real estate and stock markets, so gold became the hedge. Q2 things accelerated. New all-time high of $2,450 in May, and here's the thing — the Fed signaled three or four rate cuts coming in 2024, and that's when gold really took off. You had short covering, momentum traders piling in, the whole thing just ran. Even some ETFs that had been bleeding started seeing inflows. Q3 set another record at $2,672. The Fed dropped 50 basis points in September, which was aggressive. But honestly, I think the real driver was still central bank accumulation — that's been the story for 15 years. They're the ultimate buy-and-hold players, just removing supply from the market. Meanwhile, you had big M&A activity with mining companies — Gold Fields acquiring Osisko, AngloGold buying Centamin. Then Q4 got messy. Started strong at $2,660, dipped to $2,608, then spiked to $2,785 on October 30 after that weaker CPI report. November was volatile — Trump's win sent it down to $2,664, but the Fed's 25 basis point cut bounced it back over $2,700. The Ukraine situation escalated with long-range missiles, Russia lowering its nuclear threshold, all that scary stuff. That geopolitical risk definitely supported the price of gold in 2024's final stretch. By year-end, the price of gold in 2024 closed around $2,660, up roughly 40% from where it started. What strikes me is how central banks added 186 metric tons in Q3 alone, and on a rolling four-quarter basis they're still at 909 metric tons. That's actually down from 1,215 a year prior, so maybe some of that momentum is cooling. Looking at it all, 2024 was really about uncertainty being the ultimate driver. Geopolitical mess, economic fragility, central banks hedging their bets — all classic conditions that make gold attractive. With Trump heading back to the White House in 2025, you've got trade policy unknowns, potential inflation pressures, all kinds of variables that could keep people interested in precious metals as portfolio insurance. The price of gold in 2024 basically reflected investors finally waking up to the fact that having some physical assets outside the traditional financial system might not be a bad idea.
0
0
0
0