People keep calling Arch an L2. Wrong. It's a native Execution Layer.



This isn't word games—it's about how state, assets, and security actually work with Bitcoin under the hood.

The difference between Arch Network and typical Bitcoin L2s? It comes down to architecture, not marketing labels.

Most L2 solutions bolt onto Bitcoin. Arch integrates differently. State handling, asset bridging, security inheritance—all structured in a way that breaks the L2 mold.

Why does this matter? Because execution models determine scalability limits, trust assumptions, and what you can actually build on top of Bitcoin.
BTC1.75%
此頁面可能包含第三方內容,僅供參考(非陳述或保證),不應被視為 Gate 認可其觀點表述,也不得被視為財務或專業建議。詳見聲明
  • 讚賞
  • 10
  • 轉發
  • 分享
留言
0/400
MEV午夜食客vip
· 12-13 15:01
早安,又是一个"我們不是L2,我們是native"的時刻...行吧,那就等著被套利機器人們教育吧
查看原文回復0
毛绒绒提款机vip
· 12-13 02:13
呃,native execution layer聽起來很高級,但真正能跑起來才算數吧
查看原文回復0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 12-12 00:47
又来了這套說法...說白了還不是想證明自己與眾不同?Native Execution Layer聽著確實更高級,但能真正跑出來才算數
查看原文回復0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 12-11 16:00
哥們這術語遊戲玩得真溜,但說實話我還是沒搞明白為啥非得改個名字...
查看原文回復0
blockBoyvip
· 12-11 15:55
又來一個"不是L2是execution layer"的論調...說白了還不是為了行銷?
查看原文回復0
炒币老母亲vip
· 12-11 15:48
哈,又來個新概念...execution layer vs L2,说白了还不是互相拱火
查看原文回復0
RunWithRugsvip
· 12-11 15:45
又開始玩文字遊戲了,什麼 L2 native execution layer,說白了還不是想從比特幣吸血
查看原文回復0
LiquidityLarryvip
· 12-11 15:45
ngl這詞匯遊戲玩得挺溜,但真正關鍵是能不能跑起來吧
查看原文回復0
反向指标哥vip
· 12-11 15:43
又来了,这詞兒玩得越來越花了...execution layer聽著就像在給自己造概念,真能比L2快那麼多?
查看原文回復0
戴上帽子说话vip
· 12-11 15:43
又一个"不是L2"的故事,听烦了...真正的问题是Arch能跑起来吗?
回復0
查看更多
交易,隨時隨地
qrCode
掃碼下載 Gate App
社群列表
繁體中文
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)