XOM

エクソンモービル 価格

XOM
¥26,163.31
+¥86.19(+0.33%)

*データ最終更新日:2026-04-07 20:33(UTC+8)

2026-04-07 20:33時点で、エクソンモービル(XOM)の価格は¥26,163.31、時価総額は¥109.83T、PERは18.06、配当利回りは2.44%です。 本日の株価は¥25,818.54から¥26,535.23の間で変動しました。現在の価格は本日安値より1.33%高く、本日高値より1.40%低く、取引高は6.29Mです。 過去52週間で、XOMは¥16,150.35から¥28,158.56の間で取引されており、現在の価格は52週間高値より-7.08%低い水準にあります。

XOM 主な統計情報

前日終値¥26,077.12
時価総額¥109.83T
取引量6.29M
P/E比率18.06
配当利回り(TTM)2.44%
配当額¥164.41
希薄化EPS(TTM)6.65
純利益(FY)¥4.60T
収益(FY)¥51.70T
決算日2026-05-01
EPS予想1.80
収益予測¥12.84T
発行済株式数4.21B
ベータ(1年)0.288
権利落ち日2026-02-12
配当支払日2026-03-10

XOMについて

エクソンモービル株式会社は、アメリカ合衆国内外で原油と天然ガスの探査・生産を行っています。同社は、アップストリーム、ダウンストリーム、化学セグメントを通じて事業を展開しています。また、原油、天然ガス、石油製品、石油化学品、その他の特殊製品の製造、取引、輸送、販売にも関与しています。さらに、オレフィン、ポリオレフィン、芳香族などの石油化学品の製造・販売や、二酸化炭素、水素、バイオ燃料の回収・貯蔵も行っています。2021年12月31日時点で、証明された埋蔵量を持つ純運営井戸数は約20,528本です。同社は1870年に設立され、テキサス州アービングに本社を置いています。
セクターエネルギー
業界石油・ガス統合
CEODarren W. Woods
本社Spring,TX,US
公式ウェブサイトhttps://corporate.exxonmobil.com
従業員数(FY)58.00K
平均収益(1年)¥891.40M
従業員一人当たりの純利益¥79.38M

エクソンモービル(XOM)よくある質問

今日のエクソンモービル(XOM)の株価はいくらですか?

x
エクソンモービル(XOM)は現在¥26,163.31で取引されており、24時間の変動率は+0.33%です。52週の取引レンジは¥16,150.35~¥28,158.56です。

エクソンモービル(XOM)の52週間の高値と安値はいくらですか?

x

エクソンモービル(XOM)の株価収益率(P/E比率)はいくらですか? この指標は何を示していますか?

x

エクソンモービル(XOM)の時価総額はいくらですか?

x

エクソンモービル(XOM)の直近の四半期ごとの1株当たり利益(EPS)はいくらですか?

x

今、エクソンモービル(XOM)を買うべきか、売るべきか?

x

エクソンモービル(XOM)の株価に影響を与える要因は何ですか?

x

エクソンモービル(XOM)株の購入方法

x

リスク警告

株式市場は高いリスクと価格変動を伴います。投資の価値は上昇または下落する可能性があり、投資元本の全額を回収できない場合があります。過去の実績は将来の結果を保証するものではありません。投資判断を行う前に、ご自身の投資経験、財務状況、投資目的、リスク許容度を十分に評価し、独自に調査を行ってください。必要に応じて、独立したファイナンシャルアドバイザーにご相談ください。

免責事項

本ページの内容は情報提供のみを目的としており、投資助言、財務上の助言、または取引推奨を構成するものではありません。Gateは、かかる財務上の意思決定に起因するいかなる損失または損害についても責任を負いません。また、Gateは、アメリカ合衆国、カナダ、イラン、キューバを含むがこれらに限られない一部の市場および法域において、完全なサービスを提供できない場合があることにご留意ください。制限対象地域に関する詳細は、ユーザー契約をご参照ください。

その他の取引市場

エクソンモービルについての人気投稿 (XOM)

EqunixHub

EqunixHub

04-03 07:23
#国际油价走高 The $140 Shock: How the Iran–US Escalation on April 3 Just Rewrote Global Market Rules Just when the world thought energy markets had stabilized after two years of painful adjustments, a single day changed everything. On April 3, the attack on the Beik Road Bridge in Karaj—and Iran’s swift retaliatory strike—ignited a crude oil price explosion that market veterans will remember for decades. By settlement, WTI crude had surged 15%, breaking past $110 for the first time since 2022. But the real shock came from spot Brent crude: prices briefly soared past $140, a level untouched since the all-time highs of the 2008 financial crisis. This is not just another headline. This is a structural shift. And if you hold stocks, crypto, commodities, or simply pay for gasoline and heating, you need to understand what comes next. Part One: The Conflict – From Tensions to Uncontrolled Escalation? The attack on the Beik Road Bridge in Karaj was not a minor skirmish. The bridge is a strategic artery in northern Iran, critical for both civilian logistics and military movement near the Alborz mountains. While details remain fluid, initial reports confirm that the strike bore hallmarks of a precision operation—plausibly linked to enhanced US or allied intelligence assets. Iran’s retaliation came within hours. That speed is significant. Tehran has historically observed a “strategic patience” doctrine, but this time, the response was immediate and public. Ballistic missile and drone launches targeted regional assets linked to US forces. The message was clear: the old red lines have moved. So, has the conflict become uncontrollable? Not yet—but the margin for error has vanished. The Iran–US shadow war has flirted with open conflict for years. However, the Karaj attack represents a potential “tripwire event.” Unlike previous provocations (tanker seizures, drone shoot-downs, base bombings), this one occurred inside Iran’s core territory, not in Syria, Iraq, or international waters. Three indicators suggest we are now in uncharted territory: 1. Retaliatory symmetry is broken. Past exchanges followed an escalatory ladder. Now, a bridge attack inside Iran draws immediate missile fire. Next time, a military facility could trigger a direct strike on a US asset in the Gulf. 2. Energy choke points are now active battlegrounds. The Strait of Hormuz—through which 20% of global oil passes—has been placed on unofficial war alert. Shipping insurance premiums for tankers exiting the Gulf rose over 300% within 24 hours. 3. Diplomatic silence. Neither the UN nor major powers have issued effective de-escalation statements. The silence suggests back-channel talks have collapsed. In short: the conflict is not yet an all-out regional war, but it has exited the controllable phase. We are now in a high-intensity crisis mode, with a non-zero probability of direct US–Iran engagement within weeks. Part Two: Global Energy Crisis – Déjà Vu or Something Worse? The energy crisis of 2021–2022 was driven by post-pandemic demand, supply chain chaos, and the initial shock of the Russia-Ukraine war. This time, the cocktail is more dangerous. Why this oil shock differs from 2022: · Supply elasticity is zero. In 2022, the world still had strategic reserves (the US released over 180 million barrels from the SPR), spare OPEC+ capacity, and a functioning Russian energy export system (sanctions aside). Today: US SPR is at its lowest level since 1983. OPEC+ spare capacity is concentrated in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both now openly hesitant to ramp up in the middle of a US–Iran war that could draw them in. · Brent at $140 is not a spike—it’s a signal. Spot prices crossing $140 means physical buyers are panic-bidding for actual cargoes, not just futures contracts. That indicates real supply interruption fears, not speculative froth. · Iranian oil is gone from global markets. Before this escalation, Iran was exporting 1.5–1.7 million barrels per day (bpd), much of it to China via shadow fleets. Those flows have now effectively stopped. Tankers are idling, and China is reluctant to accept cargoes that could trigger secondary sanctions. · The Houthi factor. Yemen’s Houthi forces, aligned with Iran, have already launched drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities in the past. Another major strike on Abqaiq (the world’s largest oil processing plant) would remove 5–7 million bpd overnight. That threat is now priced at a non-zero probability. Real-world impact forecast: · US average gasoline price: likely to hit $5.50–$6.50 per gallon within 4–6 weeks. · European natural gas: will surge again as LNG tankers are diverted to Asia, which is now bidding up prices to replace lost Iranian and potential Gulf crude. · Emerging markets: India, Turkey, and much of Southeast Asia face current account crises and currency devaluation risks. This is not merely a “reemerging” energy crisis. It is a new, more brittle energy order where the last safety nets have already been used. Part Three: Did You Catch the Oil Rally? Strategy Lessons For traders who positioned before April 3, the 15% WTI surge delivered extraordinary returns. But catching a move like this is less about luck and more about understanding structural triggers. Who made money? · Long-term holders of physical oil ETFs (USO, BNO) who accumulated during the $70–$80 range. · Options traders who bought out-of-the-money calls with 30–60 day expirations on WTI or Brent. · Energy sector equity investors (XLE, CVX, XOM) who recognized that geopolitical risk premia had collapsed to irrational lows in March. But holding oil now is a different game. Post-spike, three strategies emerge: 1. The momentum trade (high risk): If Brent holds above $130 for three consecutive sessions, the next technical target is $160–$180. This requires the conflict to expand, not contract. Use tight stops (5–7%). 2. The volatility sell (advanced): Sell out-of-the-money put spreads on oil companies. Implied volatility is extreme. Premiums are high. If prices stabilize or pull back modestly, you capture time decay. 3. The hedge approach (for crypto/equity portfolios): Maintain a small (3–5%) allocation to oil futures or energy stocks as a direct hedge against inflation and war risk. Rebalance weekly. Warning: Do not chase at $140 Brent. The likelihood of a 10–15% correction if diplomatic channels unexpectedly reopen (however unlikely) is real. Wait for a pullback toward $115–$120 before establishing new longs. Part Four: Crypto and War – How Should Mainstream Coins Position? The relationship between geopolitical conflict and cryptocurrency is not linear. Unlike oil (which has a clear supply-demand shock model), crypto reacts through three different channels. Channel 1: The inflation hedge narrative Oil at $140 means inflation expectations will reaccelerate. The US Fed is now trapped: raise rates further to fight energy inflation (risking a deep recession), or hold steady (allowing inflation to become entrenched). Bitcoin maximalists argue that this is precisely the environment BTC was built for—a non-sovereign, supply-capped asset. Historical precedent: In March 2022, after Russia invaded Ukraine and oil surged, Bitcoin initially fell 10% (risk-off liquidation), then rallied 25% over the following six weeks as inflation fears dominated. A similar pattern is possible now. Channel 2: Liquidity flight to cash War triggers uncertainty. Uncertainty triggers selling of volatile assets. Crypto remains among the most volatile asset classes. If the conflict escalates into open US–Iran warfare, expect a sharp, sudden 15–25% drawdown across BTC, ETH, and major altcoins within 48 hours as traders flee to the US dollar. This is not a contradiction with Channel 1. It is a sequence: first sell everything that moves (crash), then re-enter assets that benefit from the new regime (recovery). The key question is the speed and depth of the crash. Channel 3: Energy cost of mining Bitcoin’s hashrate is geographically concentrated. A sustained $140+ oil price means electricity costs in many mining regions (especially natural-gas-dependent areas like the Middle East and parts of the US) will spike. Less efficient miners will be forced offline. A post-halving (April 2024) reduction in block rewards already squeezed margins. Now, energy inflation could trigger a mining capitulation event—temporarily slowing network hashrate but historically bullish for price as weaker hands sell coins to cover operating costs. Positioning recommendations for crypto holders: · Bitcoin (BTC): Hold core position (minimum 60% of crypto portfolio). Add on any dip below $55,000 if war fears spike. BTC remains the cleanest institutional gateway for geopolitically driven inflation hedging. · Ethereum (ETH): More sensitive to risk-off sentiment than BTC, but stronger long-term fundamentals. Use a barbell approach: hold ETH for the staking yield, but reduce size relative to BTC during active conflict. · Altcoins: Avoid most mid-caps unless they have explicit energy or commodity exposure (e.g., renewable energy-focused L1s). Meme coins and high-beta DeFi tokens will get crushed first and recover last. · Stablecoins: Hold 15–20% of total portfolio in USDC or DAI on-chain, ready to deploy during the inevitable panic dip. Do not hold Tether (USDT) if regulatory uncertainty around sanctions compliance rises. The crypto-specific wildcard: If the US government expands financial sanctions to include crypto wallets linked to Iranian entities, expect increased pressure on centralized exchanges to freeze addresses. That could temporarily fracture off-ramp liquidity. Non-custodial solutions (Ledger, Trezor, etc.) become essential during this period. Final Outlook: Three Scenarios for the Next 30 Days Scenario 1 (40% probability): Controlled escalation イランや米国の湾岸資産へのさらなる攻撃はなく、原油は$110–$130を維持。暗号資産は10日以内に回復。市場は緊張高まる状態に適応。行動:ヘッジを維持し、下落時に石油を追加。 Scenario 2 (45%確率): 拡大する紛争 米軍資産が攻撃される。イラン内で報復攻撃。ホルムズ海峡が脅かされる。原油は$160を突破。ビットコインは20%下落、その後60日以内に35%上昇。行動:現金比率を25%に引き上げ、パニック時にBTCと石油を買う。 Scenario 3 (15%確率): 完全な地域戦争 イランがホルムズを閉鎖。米国とイスラエルが持続的攻撃を開始。2026年第3四半期に世界的な景気後退が始まる。原油は一時的に高騰し、その後需要喪失により崩壊。暗号資産は極端なボラティリティに見舞われるが、唯一の移転可能な資産の一つとして浮上。行動:レバレッジをゼロに、実物の金、ビットコインのセルフカストディ、必須商品を保持。 どの道が展開するか誰にもわからない。しかし、2026年4月3日に世界は変わった。唯一許されざる誤りは、それを否定することだ。 慎重に。流動性を保ち、取引に入る前に必ず出口戦略を確認せよ。
3
0
0
0